CLIMATE CHANGE DEBATE

Acr on wood panel.

34x34"

At its core, Climate Change Debate is about tension and irony.

Not just between people—but between ways of seeing and choosing not to see.

There’s a visual push and pull in the composition: opposing forces, fragmented perspectives, a kind of psychological friction. It reflects what I see happening in the world right now—a fractured dialogue where clarity is lost in noise.

The inspiration came from this frustration.

We are living through overlapping crises—AI acceleration, geopolitical instability, the war in Iran, the war in Ukraine, the Epstein files, and growing economic anxiety—and they’re all competing for attention. But in that noise, something critical is being pushed into the background.

Climate change.

Not because it’s less urgent—but because it’s harder to hold in focus.

THE DISTRACTION PROBLEM

What unsettles me most isn’t just denial—it’s distraction.

We are watching a slow erosion of environmental responsibility at the highest levels of power. Funding is being pulled. Science is being sidelined. Decisions are being made that will echo far beyond election cycles.

And yet, the conversation feels diluted.

It’s not that people don’t care. It’s that attention is constantly being redirected—pulled toward the immediate, the dramatic, the algorithmically amplified.

This painting is my attempt to say: Look here. Don’t look away.

A SHIFT

This piece also marks a personal shift.

I’ve realized that if I want my work to matter—truly matter—I need to align it more directly with my core values.

That doesn’t mean abandoning my exploration of consciousness. It means grounding it.

Expanding it into the real-world systems that shape our lives like geopolitics, sustainability, clclimate and ethics in an age of accelerating AI.

This is where my passion is leading me, and I’m choosing to follow it more intentionally.